Last year, I wrote a post on Editing Basics: Dos and Don'ts, which outlined a few key rules to remember when you're editing somebody else's work (on a non-professional level: beta readers, CPs, workshop settings).
And, just now, I realized that not only is the title of that post slightly misleading (sorry about that), but that I never did a follow-up: a few basic things to remember when you're the one receiving the feedback, not giving it. So here I am, and here are my own personal rules; I really invite ya'll to share your own in the comments, too!
Just for clarity, also: "editor," here, refers to your CP, beta reader, etc.
Do show your editor respect. This is a two-way street, but in regards to how you, in particular, should treat them: your editor just spent a good chunk of their time reading your entire work (whether full MS, SS, a single poem, etc) and providing detailed (hopefully) feedback. They're doing you a favor. Therefore, it's up to you to allow them the time and environment in which they can describe to you the good, the bad, the ugly, the absolutely beautiful.
Don't become defensive. Your editor is not attacking you. They're not attacking your work, either. In fact, they're not attacking anything. They're not ravenous wolves, they're a friend, a family member (well, hopefully not; most family tends to be somewhat biased), and they're one of probably many who legitimately want to see both you and your work grow.
Do take the time to seriously consider each suggestion and critique, as well. Sometimes your own work is too muddled in your head, so you can't even begin to think of new possibilities or how to patch up current unraveling threads. Being open to new ideas from your editor gives you the opportunity to potentially uncover new paths that you might not have been able to consider before.
Don't assume that every suggestion and every critique is something that has to be changed. As previously stated: take it all with a grain of salt. Consider each one; just as some suggestions might be great for your work, others might not be a right fit. Just remember: if more than one editor has the same suggestion, then it's definitely worth reconsidering.
Do ask questions. Questions, questions, questions. Be the thing that wouldn't shut up (brownie points if you understand that reference). When your editor says that something's not quite working, ask them how they think it could be fixed (remember: whatever they suggest you don't have to use) or even suggest an idea that you have, and see what they think. Asking questions is probably your best tool, and your best way to brainstorm. Talk it out, and see what happens.
*
These are extremely simple ideas, but they're also extremely important. Retaining a good and trusting relationship with your editor (CP, beta, both, whatever) is invaluable when you're trying to get a book publishing ready, whether you're going the traditional route or self-publishing.
What are some of your basic dos and don'ts of receiving feedback on your work?
Tweet It:
Receiving feedback on your work? Blogger @Rae_Slater has some basic dos and don'ts for good etiquette (Click to Tweet)
Do ask questions, don't become defensive, and other basic rules of receiving feedback from blogger @Rae_Slater (Click to Tweet)
Showing posts with label revising/editing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label revising/editing. Show all posts
Thursday, January 29, 2015
Monday, January 12, 2015
Editing in Multiple Drafts
I've already talked about creating an editing checklist as your first step in editing your novel; now, what should you do with it?
Just like everybody has a different writing process, everybody has a different editing process, too. I know many people, for example, who create a list of things they need to change or look over, and then they dive in, rip their MS apart, and tinker from there. Some people completely read over their MS before editing, some people edit as they read.
Here's the easiest way I've ever figured out: look at the list of everything you know you need to change, and tackle it one at a time. Here's a hypothetical list, for use as an example: your character changes their accent every five chapters; you've got multiple scenes where it's day and night at the same time; Molly's name changed to Mindy and then Maybelle; you need to add more world-building; you also need some description in there of your setting. To top it all off, some of your writing isn't quite up to par because you wrote it after three days of no sleep.
The list is pretty dang daunting, isn't it?
I suggest taking it one problem at a time, one draft at a time. In your first round of edits, go completely through your novel and pay attention to only your character dialogue: as you go, map out (or make a chart) of the kind of vocabulary your characters use, and as you go make sure their speech patterns remain consistent.
That's Draft Two (Draft One would be your original draft).
In Draft Three, start from the beginning again: make sure your timeline's consistent. Know when it's day and when it's night, and make sure it's easy to follow. Draft Four: make sure your characters all keep the same name until the end. Draft Five: world building! Draft Six: description.
Your final draft, no matter how many you go through, should be the one where you focus on making sure the writing is crisp, your I's are dotted, your T's crossed. That's the polishing.
See how that works? Take one problem, and address it through your entire draft. Only that problem. If you come across more issues to be edited and fixed, add it to the list to be tackled in its own time.
Personally, I work pretty broadly: my second draft of my current WIP consisted of me playing with my characters' personalities; I made some characters meaner, some nicer, and by the end I knew exactly who was wrong and who was right. My Draft Three (which I'm currently on), is about working on the plot: fixing holes and getting the exact events and orders just right.
When creating your list, also try creating a hierarchy: the most problematic problem (in your opinion) goes first.
So there's two versions, one hypothetical and one the way I'm currently using it. The point is: when you're editing, you've got a lot of work to do; instead of tackling everything at once, try, instead, to simply take it one thing at a time. Sure, it's daunting to have the drafts pile up, but each time you'll have a certain area of your novel crisper and cleaner than it was before, and with each pass you'll have crossed something off your editing checklist.
What are ya'll's go-to ways to edit?
Tweet It:
Blogger @Rae_Slater talks editing: use multiple drafts of your novel to focus on one editing goal at a time (Click to Tweet)
Just like everybody has a different writing process, everybody has a different editing process, too. I know many people, for example, who create a list of things they need to change or look over, and then they dive in, rip their MS apart, and tinker from there. Some people completely read over their MS before editing, some people edit as they read.
Here's the easiest way I've ever figured out: look at the list of everything you know you need to change, and tackle it one at a time. Here's a hypothetical list, for use as an example: your character changes their accent every five chapters; you've got multiple scenes where it's day and night at the same time; Molly's name changed to Mindy and then Maybelle; you need to add more world-building; you also need some description in there of your setting. To top it all off, some of your writing isn't quite up to par because you wrote it after three days of no sleep.
The list is pretty dang daunting, isn't it?
I suggest taking it one problem at a time, one draft at a time. In your first round of edits, go completely through your novel and pay attention to only your character dialogue: as you go, map out (or make a chart) of the kind of vocabulary your characters use, and as you go make sure their speech patterns remain consistent.
That's Draft Two (Draft One would be your original draft).
In Draft Three, start from the beginning again: make sure your timeline's consistent. Know when it's day and when it's night, and make sure it's easy to follow. Draft Four: make sure your characters all keep the same name until the end. Draft Five: world building! Draft Six: description.
Your final draft, no matter how many you go through, should be the one where you focus on making sure the writing is crisp, your I's are dotted, your T's crossed. That's the polishing.
See how that works? Take one problem, and address it through your entire draft. Only that problem. If you come across more issues to be edited and fixed, add it to the list to be tackled in its own time.
Personally, I work pretty broadly: my second draft of my current WIP consisted of me playing with my characters' personalities; I made some characters meaner, some nicer, and by the end I knew exactly who was wrong and who was right. My Draft Three (which I'm currently on), is about working on the plot: fixing holes and getting the exact events and orders just right.
When creating your list, also try creating a hierarchy: the most problematic problem (in your opinion) goes first.
So there's two versions, one hypothetical and one the way I'm currently using it. The point is: when you're editing, you've got a lot of work to do; instead of tackling everything at once, try, instead, to simply take it one thing at a time. Sure, it's daunting to have the drafts pile up, but each time you'll have a certain area of your novel crisper and cleaner than it was before, and with each pass you'll have crossed something off your editing checklist.
What are ya'll's go-to ways to edit?
Tweet It:
Blogger @Rae_Slater talks editing: use multiple drafts of your novel to focus on one editing goal at a time (Click to Tweet)
Monday, December 29, 2014
The Editing Checklist
It dawns on me that I've talked about the difference between editing and proofreading, the importance of beta readers, and also a few editing do's and don'ts regarding what those beta readers/workshops have to say about your book, but I've not quite touched on the most basic part of editing: where the heck are you going to start?
Unfortunately, you're not in the clear after merely typing out 50k+ words and handing it out to beta readers. Heck, even before you hand it out to readers, maybe you want to do your own pass on your novel to work out any major kinks. This is that excruciatingly daunting task of taking your book apart and editing it so it becomes nice and pretty. Of course, there's that awful question of where to start.
So, what's the first thing you should do? My answer: create a list.
Now, I'm not a list person. I hate lists with a passion. So I'm not saying you have to have anything fancy. All you need is a piece of paper and your favorite pencil or pen. Really, once I'm done with this post you'll be smacking your head with how simple this first step to editing is.
If you're like me, you know what needs to be fixed while you're writing your first draft. Maybe a character isn't feeling quite right as your write them; maybe you can't figure out exactly what someone's motivation is, so you just skipped over those cracks; your pacing's off, or you lost track of time.
If you haven't already, now's the time to write them down. Create your list: numbered, bulleted, a different color per problem. Doesn't matter. Just write them all down so you don't have to worry about keeping all of those problems in your head. Re-read your novel-just read it, don't try to fix anything-and see where you get tripped up, or any inconsistencies. Add those to your list.
Have you given it to a beta reader? Take in their comments, and anything you agree with: add them to the list.
There's no given length it has to be: everything you think needs fixing, write it down before actually trying to fix it all. Otherwise, you're running blind and you're more likely to create a bit of a mess (well, if you're like me: I'm just a messy child in general).
Once you've got your list, then you can dive in and start changing things. Maybe you'll completely re-write your book and tackle it all at once, or maybe you'll go through and focus on one problem at a time. Bottom line: that list will basically be your lifeline.
How do you begin your initial stage of editing?
Tweet It:
Done writing, ready to edit? Create a list, first: you'll thank yourself for it in the long run via @Rae_Slater (Click to Tweet)
Unfortunately, you're not in the clear after merely typing out 50k+ words and handing it out to beta readers. Heck, even before you hand it out to readers, maybe you want to do your own pass on your novel to work out any major kinks. This is that excruciatingly daunting task of taking your book apart and editing it so it becomes nice and pretty. Of course, there's that awful question of where to start.
So, what's the first thing you should do? My answer: create a list.
Now, I'm not a list person. I hate lists with a passion. So I'm not saying you have to have anything fancy. All you need is a piece of paper and your favorite pencil or pen. Really, once I'm done with this post you'll be smacking your head with how simple this first step to editing is.
If you're like me, you know what needs to be fixed while you're writing your first draft. Maybe a character isn't feeling quite right as your write them; maybe you can't figure out exactly what someone's motivation is, so you just skipped over those cracks; your pacing's off, or you lost track of time.
If you haven't already, now's the time to write them down. Create your list: numbered, bulleted, a different color per problem. Doesn't matter. Just write them all down so you don't have to worry about keeping all of those problems in your head. Re-read your novel-just read it, don't try to fix anything-and see where you get tripped up, or any inconsistencies. Add those to your list.
Have you given it to a beta reader? Take in their comments, and anything you agree with: add them to the list.
There's no given length it has to be: everything you think needs fixing, write it down before actually trying to fix it all. Otherwise, you're running blind and you're more likely to create a bit of a mess (well, if you're like me: I'm just a messy child in general).
Once you've got your list, then you can dive in and start changing things. Maybe you'll completely re-write your book and tackle it all at once, or maybe you'll go through and focus on one problem at a time. Bottom line: that list will basically be your lifeline.
How do you begin your initial stage of editing?
Tweet It:
Done writing, ready to edit? Create a list, first: you'll thank yourself for it in the long run via @Rae_Slater (Click to Tweet)
Monday, November 3, 2014
Kill Your Darlings
Okay, so that title is definitely not one of my more creative ones, but it should bring to mind that popular phrasing that many people use in terms of rewriting.
That's right, guys, kill them all.
Well, maybe "all" is a bit of an overstatement, but ya'll get what I'm saying, right? I'm not even talking about killing characters, either. I mean, kill any and every part of your manuscript that needs to disappear in order to make your novel stronger.
Is it going to be probably the most painful thing you've ever done? Probably. Will it make you want to bang your head against the wall when you're trying to rework your novel around this new, empty space? Most definitely.
But it's necessary.
This post is coming to you because I've recently started rewriting my WIP. I'm only on chapter three, which might sound like some good headway but in the past three weeks that's only been about 2,500 words. Yes, I am slightly ashamed of that number, and my only excuse is that school is killing me right now. But I hate using excuses because, in my world, there simply is no excuse for some things.
So I've been hanging my head in shame and getting in a few minutes of rewrites when I can.
The point is: I'm stuck on chapter three. It opens pretty quietly, so there's a lot of narrative. The problem I realized is that I simply take too long to get my character up and moving, and I take about 500 words, restating the same concept in different ways.
Like, I get it, Rae. The poor girl fell off a building, of course she's going to be in pain.
Part of my problem comes from the fact that some of the description is of my character. I mean, she's bionic. Her body heals differently.
Then again: come on, Rae, do you really need 500 words to do that?
So that's the "darling" I'm personally trying to kill right now. Not my character (she survived falling off a building, guys; killing her would be really hard to do), but, in this case, my words, themselves. My narrative. Because reading those words was kind of painful and currently I'm trying to figure out what the hell was going through my mind at the time that I wrote it.
And yes, it will be hard. Trying to cut things down or cut things out is supposed to be complicated; it disrupts the flow of everything you've already written and everything that you're mercifully sparing from your editing pen of death.
Write a lovely eulogy, cut out the extra pieces, and just know that the sacrifice you're making is going to make your novel stronger as a whole. And maybe stock up on the coffee and chocolate because damn, trying to wrap your mind about exactly how to cut something and still have your novel make sense is freaking hard.
Tweet It:
Kill your darlings, and maybe keep some chocolate around to keep you sane. @Rae_Slater talks trimming your novel (Click to Tweet)
That's right, guys, kill them all.
Well, maybe "all" is a bit of an overstatement, but ya'll get what I'm saying, right? I'm not even talking about killing characters, either. I mean, kill any and every part of your manuscript that needs to disappear in order to make your novel stronger.
Is it going to be probably the most painful thing you've ever done? Probably. Will it make you want to bang your head against the wall when you're trying to rework your novel around this new, empty space? Most definitely.
But it's necessary.
This post is coming to you because I've recently started rewriting my WIP. I'm only on chapter three, which might sound like some good headway but in the past three weeks that's only been about 2,500 words. Yes, I am slightly ashamed of that number, and my only excuse is that school is killing me right now. But I hate using excuses because, in my world, there simply is no excuse for some things.
So I've been hanging my head in shame and getting in a few minutes of rewrites when I can.
The point is: I'm stuck on chapter three. It opens pretty quietly, so there's a lot of narrative. The problem I realized is that I simply take too long to get my character up and moving, and I take about 500 words, restating the same concept in different ways.
Like, I get it, Rae. The poor girl fell off a building, of course she's going to be in pain.
Part of my problem comes from the fact that some of the description is of my character. I mean, she's bionic. Her body heals differently.
Then again: come on, Rae, do you really need 500 words to do that?
So that's the "darling" I'm personally trying to kill right now. Not my character (she survived falling off a building, guys; killing her would be really hard to do), but, in this case, my words, themselves. My narrative. Because reading those words was kind of painful and currently I'm trying to figure out what the hell was going through my mind at the time that I wrote it.
And yes, it will be hard. Trying to cut things down or cut things out is supposed to be complicated; it disrupts the flow of everything you've already written and everything that you're mercifully sparing from your editing pen of death.
Write a lovely eulogy, cut out the extra pieces, and just know that the sacrifice you're making is going to make your novel stronger as a whole. And maybe stock up on the coffee and chocolate because damn, trying to wrap your mind about exactly how to cut something and still have your novel make sense is freaking hard.
Tweet It:
Kill your darlings, and maybe keep some chocolate around to keep you sane. @Rae_Slater talks trimming your novel (Click to Tweet)
Monday, October 13, 2014
Editing Basics: Dos and Don'ts
Simple Rules to Remember When You're Editing Someone Else's Work
I'm just taking a small side note to say that I spent all yesterday working on drafting a 10 page research paper on the submarine in military history. And then I stayed up way too late to finish reading a book that I started reading on Friday. Which means that I might be a tad loopy while I write this, but hey: we're all mad here, right?
Anyway. I've been wracking my brain trying to figure out a topic for today, and since it's the first workshop day in my ENGL 304 class (Fiction Workshop), I figured I'd talk about editing: dos and don'ts.
(if anybody can tell me the correct way to spell the plural of "don't" I'll be forever grateful)
It's pretty simple, and just keep in mind that these are my own "rules" for editing in a clear and concise fashion; everyone will have their own way of editing someone else's piece, and there's also going to be a different between the way you edit a friend or CP's writing versus a total stranger. These are pretty situation-neutral, though:
**Edit: this advice is aimed at non-professional editing. Critique groups, critique partners, beta readers, etc. If your PROFESSIONAL editor (i.e. your book is going to be published and you're under contract) makes a suggestion or advises you to change/fix things, don't just take it under consideration, make the change. They know what they're doing a lot more than a non-professional**
Do point out/correct any basic spelling/grammar mistake. It might seem arbitrary, and I've honestly known a few people to get mad at me for doing this, but seriously: the last thing you want is to get called out for bad spelling and grammar. If you see the same mistake throughout the manuscript, point out the first few, and then make a note phrased somewhat like: "I noticed you [insert mistake here] a lot. Watch out for that."
Don't be rude when correcting grammar. This kind of applies to every piece of editing advice I will ever give, but seriously. Some people are simply not good at grammar things; I've met quite a few people who've had great writing, but for the life of them they couldn't stop making the same mistakes. It happens. As my professor says, "There is no direct correlation between good grammar and good writing." Help them along, offer to teach them or give them tricks if you must; never insult them because of it.
Do point out both likes and dislikes. Trust me, nobody likes getting a MS back that's full of, "Change this," or "Don't do that." I'm not saying to gush at them (I hate when I get gushed at after I ask for someone to be constructive), I'm saying to point out where they do things right. Maybe even an arrow at a certain line or description, or where they show instead of tell, and say, "Do more of this." Basically, this "rule" is all about being constructive.
Don't assume that you're the greatest editor in the world and that the author of the piece has to make the changes you suggest or else. This is particularly aimed at beta's and CPs, and basically anyone non-professional.. Lay out your suggestions, and let the author do as they may. Be open for questions from them in case they'd like some clarification. This also leads into my last point...
Do explain why you suggest something. This isn't aimed at something like fixing the spelling of a word; if you think there should be more description somewhere, tell the author why. If something doesn't make sense, tell them why. If a character is suddenly acting way different than in the beginning of the MS, point it out and say, "Why is Bob eating strawberries? Chapter two said he was deadly allergic...?" If you think a scene or a piece of narrative should be taken out explain why. If you don't, the author's either going to ignore the suggestion, or come back asking why, anyway, so save both of ya'll the trouble.
Above all, guys, something to watch out for is controlling your tone. We all know how well tone can translate across the written word, and none of us want to feel unfairly judged or attacked by somebody we trusted with our writing. Be helpful, not hurtful.
*
I really hope those make sense, but yeah. Those are my own personal, basic rules for editing. Any of ya'll have something you'd like to add to the list?
Tweet It:
Do explain, but don't assume the author has to take your suggestions. @Rae_Slater shares her basic rules for editing (Click to Tweet)
Writer @Rae_Slater starts workshopping in class today, so she shares her basic rules on editing. Have anything to add? (Click to Tweet)
Thursday, October 2, 2014
Rewrites: Beginning Again
Today's post is going to be super short. One reason is that I just don't have a lot to say, and the second is that I have a history test today at one (mountain time) and I'm trying to study for it as much as I can. so wish me luck?
Basically, it's an update. I finished my 2.5 draft of THE HOLLOW MEN about a month and a half ago. As usual after finishing a draft, I took a break. Why? I write myself out. Personally, when I finish a draft I just can't bring myself to write anything else for a week or two, and even after that I give myself a bit of distance so I can go back to the draft with a pair of fresh-ish eyes.
My break from this draft of THM happened to be six weeks, and in that time I've just been thinking about it. And to keep my writing practice up I've tried out a few different ideas.
Actually right now I'm subtly pointing to the "Secret Project" I've got on the side of this page. Because the fact is, while I love that secret project to death it just doesn't quite have the *spark* that THM has for me.
Which is why I'm going to start re-writing, or at least drafting out some new scenes for a new direction I'd like to go that I think will fix a major character motivation problem. meanwhile, I'm waiting for edits to come back from a few people, and getting as far ahead in my schoolwork as possible.
Because, let's face it: I'm ready. I'm burning inside, wanting to reconnect with these characters. And that's what I've been waiting for.
My point for today's thoughts? Don't be discouraged if you start ideas and never finish them. I've got probably upwards of 30-40 started and unfinished ideas, because while I love the overall plot they just don't have that *spark* that I was talking about. Sometimes, it just clicks. And when it does, you've really just got to roll with it.
Also: please wish me luck on this test. Pretty please?
Happy Thursday!
Tweet It:
The "spark" that burns. How #Rae_Slater knows she's ready to begin again, and start her rewrites (Click to Tweet)
Basically, it's an update. I finished my 2.5 draft of THE HOLLOW MEN about a month and a half ago. As usual after finishing a draft, I took a break. Why? I write myself out. Personally, when I finish a draft I just can't bring myself to write anything else for a week or two, and even after that I give myself a bit of distance so I can go back to the draft with a pair of fresh-ish eyes.
My break from this draft of THM happened to be six weeks, and in that time I've just been thinking about it. And to keep my writing practice up I've tried out a few different ideas.
Actually right now I'm subtly pointing to the "Secret Project" I've got on the side of this page. Because the fact is, while I love that secret project to death it just doesn't quite have the *spark* that THM has for me.
Which is why I'm going to start re-writing, or at least drafting out some new scenes for a new direction I'd like to go that I think will fix a major character motivation problem. meanwhile, I'm waiting for edits to come back from a few people, and getting as far ahead in my schoolwork as possible.
Because, let's face it: I'm ready. I'm burning inside, wanting to reconnect with these characters. And that's what I've been waiting for.
My point for today's thoughts? Don't be discouraged if you start ideas and never finish them. I've got probably upwards of 30-40 started and unfinished ideas, because while I love the overall plot they just don't have that *spark* that I was talking about. Sometimes, it just clicks. And when it does, you've really just got to roll with it.
Also: please wish me luck on this test. Pretty please?
Happy Thursday!
Tweet It:
The "spark" that burns. How #Rae_Slater knows she's ready to begin again, and start her rewrites (Click to Tweet)
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
Proofreading vs Editing
This post is going to be really short. Just a warning.
I was perusing the Twitter-sphere yesterday and came across an article: 25 Editing Tips For Your Writer's Toolbox. So I read it, and the first thing (basically) it starts with is explaining the difference between proofreading and editing, and it's a basic set of definitions that I feel are important for people to know.
Editing is the big stuff: plot, setting, dialogue, characterization. It's where you decide that Plot Point C should actually go before B and that Betty Lou should be an angry arsonist instead of a cookie-selling Girl Scout. It's your content and the way you organize it.
Proofreading is the small stuff. It's all of the misspelled words and misused grammar, the punctuation gone awry, the run-on sentences. It's everything that you wouldn't notice if you're just reading through your book or novel quickly, or even skimming it.
Basically, editing would be changing how much flour you put in the bread, and proofreading is adjusting how much butter you're putting on top. Both are required for an excellent snack (or novel), and they both come after the first time you try the recipe.
Knowing the difference is a bit important. There are actually jobs out in the great wide-somewhere that involve editing, and others that involve proofreading (also called copy-editing). They also involve different states of mind: I see editing as more of a critical-thinking exercise, while proofreading is more about making sure you're following a basic set of rules for grammar. Both, however, involve focusing your attention on certain aspects of your manuscript.
What you don't want to do is try editing and proofreading at the same time. If you rewrite something, or add a completely new set of sentences, then odds are that you're also introducing new grammar and spelling mistakes-things that need to be fixed with proofreading. The problem is that you may have already proofread everything before it, or even everything before and after, and then you'll wind up missing an entire chunk of newly-added material.
Don't do it.
Typically, editing comes before proofreading. Get your plot and content organized, first, and then dive in with your more minor fixes. Your sanity will thank you for it.
See? Told you today's post is short.
Rae
Friday, May 23, 2014
Finished a Draft; What Now?
A.K.A.: Beta Readers
I can almost guarantee you that you will never find a writer who published a book without a BETA reader. Most have more than one, as well.
Because here's the thing: you finish one draft of your book. Odds are, you're going to go through another, and another. Maybe figure three or four drafts, with nobody's eyes on it but your own. (Note: I'm just generalizing. Some people give their draft away the moment they finish, or they want to do ten drafts before somebody else reads; that's okay. It all depends what you, the writer, are most comfortable with).
After a time, though, it's as perfect as you can personally make it. You've read and edited your manuscript so many times that you can't find anything wrong.
That's where Beta's come in. They're a fresh pair of eyes. They're not just getting snippets, you're not just bouncing ideas off them. Instead, this is when they get to completely read your book from start to finish and get the full effect, as if they're reading an actual published book. Then they come back to you with (hopefully) a report of some sort: what did they like, what did they not like, what jarred them, what needed more, what needed less, etc.
This kind of feedback is priceless. It'll help you, as the author, look at your manuscript with new eyes, which will allow you to make changes to plot, characters, setting, etc that will ultimately make your novel stronger.
Beta readers are essentially the greatest things in the world.
So how do you find one? Well that's where things get interesting because you can find them basically anywhere. I lucked out. Four years ago (god, that was a long time ago) I joined the writing community, Inkpop, hosted by HarperCollins. Not only was I able to really grow as a writer, but I met the people who are currently some of my best friends, even though the site's been shut down for about three(two?) years now. These are my writing group, and a few of them I've grown to trust with anything, so they're who I bounce ideas off of, ask for opinions and, eventually, send my completed manuscripts to.
I guess that means that writing communities are one way. You can also use social media like Twitter and Facebook to send out a call and ask for people, or you can use your friends or family. Maybe a teacher or a professor?
Here's the catch, though: you need beta readers that are going to be completely and brutally honest.
This is a two-way street. On the reader's side, they need to be critical and pay attention, not just read for enjoyment (although they can do both at the same time). They need to take notes, and tell you everything that they liked and didn't like, etc (see the list I gave way up at the top of this thing). This means that parents probably aren't a good idea, since they have a tendency of, "Oh, it's lovely, sweetie." You could possibly choose a brother or sister, since (in my experience) they aren't as afraid of hurting your feelings. Same kind of thing goes for friends: make sure they're not only interested in taking this seriously, but that they'll give you honest feedback instead of trying to be supportive.
Because, above all, whoever beta's your book should be supportive. If they're trying to pull you down then they're kind of useless. But you need somebody who is supportive and wants to see you improve.
On your side, you need to be able to take criticism. The literary world is harsh. Rejections abound, and you need to be ready for them. You also need to be able to take what notes your beta's give you with a grain of salt. Distance yourself from your own manuscript and hear your beta's out. Try to see it from their point of view. They aren't attacking you; they want to see you succeed and should be giving you an abundance of areas in which you could clarify, reword, etc your manuscript. Don't be afraid to ask questions, either.
And guess what? After you get replies from your betas, you get to begin editing again. And so the writing world turns.
Rae
Beta readers are essentially the greatest things in the world.
So how do you find one? Well that's where things get interesting because you can find them basically anywhere. I lucked out. Four years ago (god, that was a long time ago) I joined the writing community, Inkpop, hosted by HarperCollins. Not only was I able to really grow as a writer, but I met the people who are currently some of my best friends, even though the site's been shut down for about three(two?) years now. These are my writing group, and a few of them I've grown to trust with anything, so they're who I bounce ideas off of, ask for opinions and, eventually, send my completed manuscripts to.
I guess that means that writing communities are one way. You can also use social media like Twitter and Facebook to send out a call and ask for people, or you can use your friends or family. Maybe a teacher or a professor?
Here's the catch, though: you need beta readers that are going to be completely and brutally honest.
This is a two-way street. On the reader's side, they need to be critical and pay attention, not just read for enjoyment (although they can do both at the same time). They need to take notes, and tell you everything that they liked and didn't like, etc (see the list I gave way up at the top of this thing). This means that parents probably aren't a good idea, since they have a tendency of, "Oh, it's lovely, sweetie." You could possibly choose a brother or sister, since (in my experience) they aren't as afraid of hurting your feelings. Same kind of thing goes for friends: make sure they're not only interested in taking this seriously, but that they'll give you honest feedback instead of trying to be supportive.
Because, above all, whoever beta's your book should be supportive. If they're trying to pull you down then they're kind of useless. But you need somebody who is supportive and wants to see you improve.
On your side, you need to be able to take criticism. The literary world is harsh. Rejections abound, and you need to be ready for them. You also need to be able to take what notes your beta's give you with a grain of salt. Distance yourself from your own manuscript and hear your beta's out. Try to see it from their point of view. They aren't attacking you; they want to see you succeed and should be giving you an abundance of areas in which you could clarify, reword, etc your manuscript. Don't be afraid to ask questions, either.
And guess what? After you get replies from your betas, you get to begin editing again. And so the writing world turns.
Rae
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Basic Tools for Editing
When you're editing your manuscript, there's an essential list of tools you're going to need:
1. Your Manuscript
2. Coffee/Tea/Caffeinated Beverage of Your Choice
3. Chocolate, or any other such kryptonite
4. Music
5. Movies
I say music and movies, but only if you need background/white noise. My roommate sometimes gets irritated with me because I'll have a movie on the television, and have earphones in (or my music will be blatantly blaring out from my laptop).
Make sure you're in a comfortable environment for yourself. You won't be able to concentrate properly if you're concerned with lots of people around you, or even vice versa, if you're the type of person who needs a busy atmosphere.
Something else I'd suggest: if your manuscript if on your computer, print it out. A physical copy looks and feels much different than electronic. In the same kind of theme: try posting a portion of it in the body of an email, in a Facebook message to a friend, on google docs. When you put your work in a different context or layout, it looks completely new, so it helps your eyes catch things that you might otherwise miss.
Also: if you're using a paper copy, use your favorite color of pen. It might sound weird, but seriously. If you love the way red looks, then use it. If that red pen intimidated you, switch it for pink, or purple, or orange. Stay away from blue and black, though; you want something bright that you can see easily.
Remember to take breaks, as well. If you've been editing for three or four hours straight, take at least ten-fifteen minutes to get up and walk away. Make some food, refill that coffee cup, go for a walk or take a trip to the gym. Keeping your mind refreshed is crucial. To go back to that paragraph on the atmosphere: sometimes a change of scenery can get you jump-started, as well. Even if it's as simple as moving from your living room to your bedroom, or as complicated as your house to a coffee shop, a change of surroundings as you edit can help, as well.
Note: editing is supposed to be messy. It can also hurt. Lock up that part of you that loves your baby, and let out that wild, critical monster with the scissors who wants to rip your story to pieces. Once you become comfortable with cutting and changing things, it'll get easier. It'll still be messy, but it'll be easier.
Happy editing!
Rae
1. Your Manuscript
2. Coffee/Tea/Caffeinated Beverage of Your Choice
3. Chocolate, or any other such kryptonite
4. Music
5. Movies
I say music and movies, but only if you need background/white noise. My roommate sometimes gets irritated with me because I'll have a movie on the television, and have earphones in (or my music will be blatantly blaring out from my laptop).
Make sure you're in a comfortable environment for yourself. You won't be able to concentrate properly if you're concerned with lots of people around you, or even vice versa, if you're the type of person who needs a busy atmosphere.
Something else I'd suggest: if your manuscript if on your computer, print it out. A physical copy looks and feels much different than electronic. In the same kind of theme: try posting a portion of it in the body of an email, in a Facebook message to a friend, on google docs. When you put your work in a different context or layout, it looks completely new, so it helps your eyes catch things that you might otherwise miss.
Also: if you're using a paper copy, use your favorite color of pen. It might sound weird, but seriously. If you love the way red looks, then use it. If that red pen intimidated you, switch it for pink, or purple, or orange. Stay away from blue and black, though; you want something bright that you can see easily.
Remember to take breaks, as well. If you've been editing for three or four hours straight, take at least ten-fifteen minutes to get up and walk away. Make some food, refill that coffee cup, go for a walk or take a trip to the gym. Keeping your mind refreshed is crucial. To go back to that paragraph on the atmosphere: sometimes a change of scenery can get you jump-started, as well. Even if it's as simple as moving from your living room to your bedroom, or as complicated as your house to a coffee shop, a change of surroundings as you edit can help, as well.
Note: editing is supposed to be messy. It can also hurt. Lock up that part of you that loves your baby, and let out that wild, critical monster with the scissors who wants to rip your story to pieces. Once you become comfortable with cutting and changing things, it'll get easier. It'll still be messy, but it'll be easier.
Happy editing!
Rae
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
The Red Pen Has Friends
We've all either seen it, or at least heard rumors of, the dreaded red pen. That's right, the editing tool that makes your manuscript bleed. Literally.
I'm not going to deny the fact that I totally love using the red pen of death. Last week, I was in the coffee shop with a friend of mine and she had me edit a short story for her Creative Writing class. So I pulled out my Iron Man pencil case, opened it up so she could see all of the pretty colors inside, and grabbed the red pen. Because, honestly. How official and terrifying do you think you look when you're using the dreaded red pen?
Pretty darn official and terrifying. Yep, that's right.
But what about when it's your own manuscript? When it's just you and your own short story, or novel, or poem, using the red pen puts you in both the power position, and the victim. You look at the red pen and suddenly feel pained to use it against your precious.
I mean, maybe it's just me, but I can't stand using a red pen on my own papers.
So I came up with a solution that fits me. See, I love using colorful pens. Green, purple, blue, maroon, and my favorites are pink and orange. So instead of using red, I use pink. And orange. And light blue. And then by the time I'm done, my manuscript has turned into a rainbow that I actually want to look at it. I see fun, and bright, an cheerful, and not the horrid and depressing color of bleeding words.
And let me tell you, this is a purely mental thing. Because if I give my papers to somebody else, that's when I want the red pen to be used. Because it's them cutting up my hopes and dreams, and not me.
Yeah, I don't know if it makes sense, either. But it helps.
The next time you have a paper version of one of your manuscripts or essays, choose your favorite color of pen to write with (preferably not black or that dark blue that's really common). You'd be surprised at how much of a difference a bright color can make, even when it comes to ripping apart your most prized collections of words.
Rae
Thoughts or Questions? Let me know what you think!
I'm not going to deny the fact that I totally love using the red pen of death. Last week, I was in the coffee shop with a friend of mine and she had me edit a short story for her Creative Writing class. So I pulled out my Iron Man pencil case, opened it up so she could see all of the pretty colors inside, and grabbed the red pen. Because, honestly. How official and terrifying do you think you look when you're using the dreaded red pen?
Pretty darn official and terrifying. Yep, that's right.
But what about when it's your own manuscript? When it's just you and your own short story, or novel, or poem, using the red pen puts you in both the power position, and the victim. You look at the red pen and suddenly feel pained to use it against your precious.I mean, maybe it's just me, but I can't stand using a red pen on my own papers.
So I came up with a solution that fits me. See, I love using colorful pens. Green, purple, blue, maroon, and my favorites are pink and orange. So instead of using red, I use pink. And orange. And light blue. And then by the time I'm done, my manuscript has turned into a rainbow that I actually want to look at it. I see fun, and bright, an cheerful, and not the horrid and depressing color of bleeding words.
And let me tell you, this is a purely mental thing. Because if I give my papers to somebody else, that's when I want the red pen to be used. Because it's them cutting up my hopes and dreams, and not me.
Yeah, I don't know if it makes sense, either. But it helps.
The next time you have a paper version of one of your manuscripts or essays, choose your favorite color of pen to write with (preferably not black or that dark blue that's really common). You'd be surprised at how much of a difference a bright color can make, even when it comes to ripping apart your most prized collections of words.
Rae
Thoughts or Questions? Let me know what you think!
Wednesday, March 12, 2014
Editing: Don't Freak Out
So just a little heads-up in case you didn't notice the title (*coughs and points*): my schedule will still follow the same thing you see on the side of the page (under the snazzy little group of letters that says 'Schedule'), but I'm not going to keep writing the titles.
For the last few months (even longer, actually) a good friend of mine has been editing and re-editing and re-editing her book, sending it out to agents, editing again, and so forth. And this week she's been stressing out as a new round of edits started. Every time I see that this is happening, I comment on her posts or message her/wait until she messages me, and I realized that I give her the same advice every time, and I think it's advice everybody needs to hear multiple times throughout their lives:
DON'T FREAK OUT.
Seriously. Just chill. Editing is overwhelming. It's critically looking at every aspect of your novel that you've spent months, or even years, perfecting. It's tearing the plot apart, re-describing the setting, analyzing every situation your characters get themselves into, adding words, deleting words, changing words, and ultimately making yourself question every decision you've ever made in your life that has led you to this point.
Breathe. In, out, in, out. Your brain won't function properly without oxygen so don't deprive it.
Editing is like writing. Only it's entirely different. Hear me out.
When you've been writing too long and get a headache, or your sentences stop making sense, or you try to spell the word 'the' five different times without ever getting it right, you take a break. You rest your eyes. When you're stumped, you change the song or go for a walk, or pop in a movie. Right? There's basically a solution for everything. So why don't you apply those strategies to editing?
Now I'm just speaking from experience, and I know that I'm not nearly to the stage that my friend's at, but if I'm staring at my notes and both manuscripts (the old version and the new), and I have absolutely no clue what I'm doing, I step away. Do I occasionally bang my head against the table or wall or laptop, and then proceed to drown myself in a sea of chocolate? Occasionally. And is there anything wrong with that? Not really, but my waistline would beg to differ.
Editing, like writing, is a state of mind. It's hard. You're going to want to quit more times than anybody could ever hope to count. You're going to throw fits that'll make your roommates/family question your sanity. And I want to let you know that it's okay.
It's okay as long as you sit back in front of your keyboard and/or manuscript and start editing again. Because you owe it to yourself. Just keep calm and write on. Take a breath. Go on a run. Get back to your book. Keep climbing that ladder and keep trudging on.
Stay Crazy,
Rae
Thoughts or Questions? Let me know what you think!
For the last few months (even longer, actually) a good friend of mine has been editing and re-editing and re-editing her book, sending it out to agents, editing again, and so forth. And this week she's been stressing out as a new round of edits started. Every time I see that this is happening, I comment on her posts or message her/wait until she messages me, and I realized that I give her the same advice every time, and I think it's advice everybody needs to hear multiple times throughout their lives:DON'T FREAK OUT.
Seriously. Just chill. Editing is overwhelming. It's critically looking at every aspect of your novel that you've spent months, or even years, perfecting. It's tearing the plot apart, re-describing the setting, analyzing every situation your characters get themselves into, adding words, deleting words, changing words, and ultimately making yourself question every decision you've ever made in your life that has led you to this point.
Breathe. In, out, in, out. Your brain won't function properly without oxygen so don't deprive it.
Editing is like writing. Only it's entirely different. Hear me out.
When you've been writing too long and get a headache, or your sentences stop making sense, or you try to spell the word 'the' five different times without ever getting it right, you take a break. You rest your eyes. When you're stumped, you change the song or go for a walk, or pop in a movie. Right? There's basically a solution for everything. So why don't you apply those strategies to editing?
Now I'm just speaking from experience, and I know that I'm not nearly to the stage that my friend's at, but if I'm staring at my notes and both manuscripts (the old version and the new), and I have absolutely no clue what I'm doing, I step away. Do I occasionally bang my head against the table or wall or laptop, and then proceed to drown myself in a sea of chocolate? Occasionally. And is there anything wrong with that? Not really, but my waistline would beg to differ.
Editing, like writing, is a state of mind. It's hard. You're going to want to quit more times than anybody could ever hope to count. You're going to throw fits that'll make your roommates/family question your sanity. And I want to let you know that it's okay.
It's okay as long as you sit back in front of your keyboard and/or manuscript and start editing again. Because you owe it to yourself. Just keep calm and write on. Take a breath. Go on a run. Get back to your book. Keep climbing that ladder and keep trudging on.
Stay Crazy,
Rae
Thoughts or Questions? Let me know what you think!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)